DCIPs/EIPS/eip-3978.md

87 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
eip: 3978
title: Gas refunds on reverts
description: Reprice reverted SSTORE/CREATE/SELFDESTRUCT/LOGX operations gas via gas refund mechanism
author: Anton Bukov (@k06a), Mikhail Melnik (@ZumZoom)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-3978-gas-refunds-on-reverts/7071/
status: Stagnant
type: Standards Track
category: Core
created: 2021-09-16
updated: 2022-02-14
requires: 2929
---
## Abstract
For reverted state modification operations, keep access cost, but refund modification cost.
## Motivation
Reverting a transaction, or any of its sub-calls, drops any state modifications that happened inside.
But now, users are being charged for the dropped modifications as if they persisted.
Since [EIP-3298](./eip-3298.md), the gas refund mechanism works for storage restores only inside the same transaction. But on revert, the gas refund is not increased; it is completely erased.
It can even be cheaper to transfer tokens back at the end of a transaction instead of reverting, to keep the existing gas refund.
This should be changed.
- Reverted SSTORE deserves to be repriced to SLOAD gas (100 gas)
- Reverted LOG0, LOG1, LOG2, LOG3 and LOG4 deserve to be repriced to 100 gas
- Reverted CALL with value (`positive_value_cost` = 9,000 gas) deserves to be repriced to 100 gas
- Reverted CALL with value and account creation (`value_to_empty_account_cost` = 25,000 gas) deserves to be repriced to 100 gas
- Reverted CREATE and CREATE2 (32,000 gas) deserve to be repriced to 100 gas
- Reverted SELFDESTRUCT (5,000 or 25,000 gas) deserves to be repriced to 100 gas
Moreover, it seems fair to charge CREATE and CREATE2 operations 32,000 fix price conditionally only if returned bytecode is not empty.
## Specification
For each callframe, track `revert_gas_refund`, initially 0.
The set of operations that modify `revert_gas_refund` are:
- SSTORE
- LOG0, LOG1, LOG2, LOG3, LOG4
- CALL
- CREATE, CREATE2
- SELFDESTRUCT
They increase `revert_gas_refund` as follows:
```javascript
call.revert_gas_refund += operation.gas - WARM_STORAGE_READ_COST
```
And in case of revert let's use this value instead of just erasing `gas_refund`:
```javascript
if (call.reverted) {
// existing behavior
tx.gas_refund -= call.gas_refund;
// New behavior added to existing according to the EIP-3978
tx.gas_refund += call.revert_gas_refund;
}
```
## Rationale
Gas should reflect the cost of use.
The revert cost reflects the cost of access during execution, but not the cost of modification.
## Backwards Compatibility
No known backward incompatibilities.
## Test Cases
TBD
## Reference Implementation
TBD
## Security Considerations
TBD
## Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).