--- eip: 3978 title: Gas refunds on reverts description: Reprice reverted SSTORE/CREATE/SELFDESTRUCT/LOGX operations gas via gas refund mechanism author: Anton Bukov (@k06a), Mikhail Melnik (@ZumZoom) discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-3978-gas-refunds-on-reverts/7071/ status: Stagnant type: Standards Track category: Core created: 2021-09-16 updated: 2022-02-14 requires: 2929 --- ## Abstract For reverted state modification operations, keep access cost, but refund modification cost. ## Motivation Reverting a transaction, or any of its sub-calls, drops any state modifications that happened inside. But now, users are being charged for the dropped modifications as if they persisted. Since [EIP-3298](./eip-3298.md), the gas refund mechanism works for storage restores only inside the same transaction. But on revert, the gas refund is not increased; it is completely erased. It can even be cheaper to transfer tokens back at the end of a transaction instead of reverting, to keep the existing gas refund. This should be changed. - Reverted SSTORE deserves to be repriced to SLOAD gas (100 gas) - Reverted LOG0, LOG1, LOG2, LOG3 and LOG4 deserve to be repriced to 100 gas - Reverted CALL with value (`positive_value_cost` = 9,000 gas) deserves to be repriced to 100 gas - Reverted CALL with value and account creation (`value_to_empty_account_cost` = 25,000 gas) deserves to be repriced to 100 gas - Reverted CREATE and CREATE2 (32,000 gas) deserve to be repriced to 100 gas - Reverted SELFDESTRUCT (5,000 or 25,000 gas) deserves to be repriced to 100 gas Moreover, it seems fair to charge CREATE and CREATE2 operations 32,000 fix price conditionally only if returned bytecode is not empty. ## Specification For each callframe, track `revert_gas_refund`, initially 0. The set of operations that modify `revert_gas_refund` are: - SSTORE - LOG0, LOG1, LOG2, LOG3, LOG4 - CALL - CREATE, CREATE2 - SELFDESTRUCT They increase `revert_gas_refund` as follows: ```javascript call.revert_gas_refund += operation.gas - WARM_STORAGE_READ_COST ``` And in case of revert let's use this value instead of just erasing `gas_refund`: ```javascript if (call.reverted) { // existing behavior tx.gas_refund -= call.gas_refund; // New behavior added to existing according to the EIP-3978 tx.gas_refund += call.revert_gas_refund; } ``` ## Rationale Gas should reflect the cost of use. The revert cost reflects the cost of access during execution, but not the cost of modification. ## Backwards Compatibility No known backward incompatibilities. ## Test Cases TBD ## Reference Implementation TBD ## Security Considerations TBD ## Copyright Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).