DCIPs/EIPS/eip-698.md

86 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
eip: 698
title: OPCODE 0x46 BLOCKREWARD
author: Cody Burns <dontPanic@codywburns.com>
discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/698
status: Stagnant
type: Standards Track
category: Core
created: 2017-08-28
---
## Simple Summary
This EIP adds an additional opcode to the EVM which will return a finalized blocks reward value.
## Abstract
In the EVM, the 0x40 opcodes are reserved for `Block Information`. Currently reserved opcodes are:
* `0X40 BLOCKHASH`
* `0X41 COINBASE`
* `0X42 TIMESTAMP`
* `0X43 NUMBER`
* `0X44 DIFFICULTY`
* `0X45 GASLIMIT`
This EIP would add an additional opcode, `0x46 BLOCKREWARD`, which would return the block reward for any finalized block. The finalized block reward would include the base reward, uncle payments, and gas.
## Motivation
Per EIP-649 ( #669 ) periodic block reward reductions/variance are now planned in the roadmap, however, this EIP is consensus system agnostic and is most useful in decentralized pool operations and for any contract that benefits from knowing a block reward payout(i.e. Merge mined tokens)
## Specification
After block `n` all clients should process opcode `0x46` as follows:
* Value: `0x46`
* Mnemonic: `BLOCKREWARD`
* δ:` 0` nothing removed from stack
* α:`1` block reward added to stack
* Description: `Get the block's reward emission`
* GasCost: `G<sub>base</sub>`
Where:`µ'<sub>s</sub>[0] ≡ I<sub>HR</sub>`
## Rationale
### Contract Mining Pools
For distributed consensus systems(staking pools and mining pools) ad hoc groups combine resources in order to reduce variance in payouts. Broadly, pool operations function by allowing a collective of miners / stakers to verify their contribution to solving PoW or staking share by periodically submitting solutions which are is representative of the miners probability of finding a true block.
In all these schemes `B` stands for a block reward minus pool fee and `p` is a probability of finding a block in a share attempt ( `p=1/D`, where `D` is current block difficulty).
Some common methods of mining pool payout are pay-per-share, `R = B * p`, proportional [`R = B * (n/N)` where `n` is amount of a miners shares, and `N` is amount of all shares in this round.], and pay-per-last-N-shares [`R = B * (n/N)` where miner's reward is calculated on a basis of `N` last shares, instead of all shares for the last round]. All of these methods are predicated on knowing the block reward paid for a given block. In order to provide a trust minimized solution, `0x46` can be used to call a blocks reward for computing payouts.
### Merge mined tokens
Contracts could create tokens which could be variably minted as a function of block reward by calling `0x46`
## Backwards Compatibility
### Currently deployed contracts
No impact
### Current clients
This EIP would be incompatible with currently deployed clients that are not able to handle `0x46` and would process all transactions and block containing the opcode as invalid.
Implementation should occur as part of a coordinated hardfork.
## Implementation
## Further reading
[Mining Pools](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_pool)
The Yellow Paper Appendix H. Virtual Machine Specification section H.2
## Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).