p1r0
/
rustlings
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: move lifetimes above tests in recommended order

This commit is contained in:
Sagar Vora 2023-04-02 12:25:24 +05:30
parent 09dc7058c9
commit b1fb38e73c
1 changed files with 27 additions and 27 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

54
info.toml
View File

@ -748,6 +748,33 @@ hint = """
To find the best solution to this challenge you're going to need to think back to your To find the best solution to this challenge you're going to need to think back to your
knowledge of traits, specifically Trait Bound Syntax - you may also need this: `use std::fmt::Display;`.""" knowledge of traits, specifically Trait Bound Syntax - you may also need this: `use std::fmt::Display;`."""
# LIFETIMES
[[exercises]]
name = "lifetimes1"
path = "exercises/lifetimes/lifetimes1.rs"
mode = "compile"
hint = """
Let the compiler guide you. Also take a look at the book if you need help:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-03-lifetime-syntax.html"""
[[exercises]]
name = "lifetimes2"
path = "exercises/lifetimes/lifetimes2.rs"
mode = "compile"
hint = """
Remember that the generic lifetime 'a will get the concrete lifetime that is equal to the smaller of the lifetimes of x and y.
You can take at least two paths to achieve the desired result while keeping the inner block:
1. Move the string2 declaration to make it live as long as string1 (how is result declared?)
2. Move println! into the inner block"""
[[exercises]]
name = "lifetimes3"
path = "exercises/lifetimes/lifetimes3.rs"
mode = "compile"
hint = """
If you use a lifetime annotation in a struct's fields, where else does it need to be added?"""
# TESTS # TESTS
[[exercises]] [[exercises]]
@ -780,33 +807,6 @@ You can call a function right where you're passing arguments to `assert!` -- so
something like `assert!(having_fun())`. If you want to check that you indeed get false, you something like `assert!(having_fun())`. If you want to check that you indeed get false, you
can negate the result of what you're doing using `!`, like `assert!(!having_fun())`.""" can negate the result of what you're doing using `!`, like `assert!(!having_fun())`."""
# LIFETIMES
[[exercises]]
name = "lifetimes1"
path = "exercises/lifetimes/lifetimes1.rs"
mode = "compile"
hint = """
Let the compiler guide you. Also take a look at the book if you need help:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-03-lifetime-syntax.html"""
[[exercises]]
name = "lifetimes2"
path = "exercises/lifetimes/lifetimes2.rs"
mode = "compile"
hint = """
Remember that the generic lifetime 'a will get the concrete lifetime that is equal to the smaller of the lifetimes of x and y.
You can take at least two paths to achieve the desired result while keeping the inner block:
1. Move the string2 declaration to make it live as long as string1 (how is result declared?)
2. Move println! into the inner block"""
[[exercises]]
name = "lifetimes3"
path = "exercises/lifetimes/lifetimes3.rs"
mode = "compile"
hint = """
If you use a lifetime annotation in a struct's fields, where else does it need to be added?"""
# STANDARD LIBRARY TYPES # STANDARD LIBRARY TYPES
[[exercises]] [[exercises]]