From eacf7db6f34f7c884b2a736a35fa997299b34485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anish <98446102+novanish@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:18:17 +0545
Subject: [PATCH] refactor: Update comment to use correct construct name
 'Result' instead of 'Option'

Refactor the comment in the code to provide a more accurate description of the construct being used. Replace the mention of Option with Result.
---
 exercises/error_handling/errors1.rs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/exercises/error_handling/errors1.rs b/exercises/error_handling/errors1.rs
index 0ba59a5..13d2724 100644
--- a/exercises/error_handling/errors1.rs
+++ b/exercises/error_handling/errors1.rs
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 // This function refuses to generate text to be printed on a nametag if you pass
 // it an empty string. It'd be nicer if it explained what the problem was,
 // instead of just sometimes returning `None`. Thankfully, Rust has a similar
-// construct to `Option` that can be used to express error conditions. Let's use
+// construct to `Result` that can be used to express error conditions. Let's use
 // it!
 //
 // Execute `rustlings hint errors1` or use the `hint` watch subcommand for a