forked from DecentralizedClimateFoundation/DCIPs
109 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
109 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
eip: 6170
|
||
|
title: Cross-Chain Messaging Interface
|
||
|
description: A common smart contract interface for interacting with messaging protocols.
|
||
|
author: Sujith Somraaj (@sujithsomraaj)
|
||
|
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/cross-chain-messaging-standard/12197
|
||
|
status: Draft
|
||
|
type: Standards Track
|
||
|
category: ERC
|
||
|
created: 2022-12-19
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Abstract
|
||
|
|
||
|
This EIP introduces a common interface for cross-chain arbitrary message bridges (AMBs) to send and receive a cross-chain message (state).
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Motivation
|
||
|
|
||
|
Currently, cross-chain arbitrary message bridges lack standardization, resulting in complex competing implementations: Layerzero, Hyperlane, Axelar, Wormhole, Matic State Tunnel and others. Either chain native (or) seperate message bridge, the problem prevails. Adding a common standardized interface to the arbitrary message bridges provides these benefits:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Ease Of Development:** A common standard interface would help developers build scalable cross-chain applications with ease.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Improved Scalability:** Cross-chain applications can efficiently use multiple message bridges.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Improved Security:** Confronting security to specific parameters. At present, every message bridge has its diverse security variable. E.g., In Layerzero, the nonce is used to prevent a replay attack, whereas Hyperlane uses the Merkle root hash.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Improved Robustness:** Message bridges involving off-chain components are not censorship-resistant and are prone to downtimes. Hence, apps built on top of them have no choice but to migrate their entire state (which is highly impossible for large complex applications).
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Specification
|
||
|
|
||
|
The keywords "MUST," "MUST NOT," "REQUIRED," "SHALL," "SHALL NOT," "SHOULD," "SHOULD NOT," "RECOMMENDED," "MAY," and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Every compliant cross-chain arbitrary message bridge must implement the following interface.
|
||
|
|
||
|
``` solidity
|
||
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-3.0
|
||
|
|
||
|
pragma solidity >=0.8.0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// @title Cross-Chain Messaging interface
|
||
|
/// @dev Allows seamless interchain messaging.
|
||
|
/// @author Sujith Somraaj
|
||
|
/// Note: Bytes are used throughout the implementation to support non-evm chains.
|
||
|
|
||
|
interface IEIP6170 {
|
||
|
/// @dev This emits when a cross-chain message is sent.
|
||
|
/// Note: MessageSent MUST trigger when a message is sent, including zero bytes transfers.
|
||
|
event MessageSent(
|
||
|
bytes to,
|
||
|
bytes toChainId,
|
||
|
bytes message,
|
||
|
bytes extraData
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// @dev This emits when a cross-chain message is received.
|
||
|
/// MessageReceived MUST trigger on any successful call to receiveMessage(bytes chainId, bytes sender, bytes message) function.
|
||
|
event MessageReceived(bytes from, bytes fromChainId, bytes message);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// @dev Sends a message to a receiving address on a different blockchain.
|
||
|
/// @param chainId_ is the unique identifier of receiving blockchain.
|
||
|
/// @param receiver_ is the address of the receiver.
|
||
|
/// @param message_ is the arbitrary message to be delivered.
|
||
|
/// @param data_ is a bridge-specific encoded data for off-chain relayer infrastructure.
|
||
|
/// @return the status of the process on the sending chain.
|
||
|
/// Note: this function is designed to support both evm and non-evm chains
|
||
|
/// Note: proposing chain-ids be the bytes encoding their native token name string. For eg., abi.encode("ETH"), abi.encode("SOL") imagining they cannot override.
|
||
|
function sendMessage(
|
||
|
bytes memory chainId_,
|
||
|
bytes memory receiver_,
|
||
|
bytes memory message_,
|
||
|
bytes memory data_
|
||
|
) external payable returns (bool);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// @dev Receives a message from a sender on a different blockchain.
|
||
|
/// @param chainId_ is the unique identifier of the sending blockchain.
|
||
|
/// @param sender_ is the address of the sender.
|
||
|
/// @param message_ is the arbitrary message sent by the sender.
|
||
|
/// @param data_ is an additional parameter to be used for security purposes. E.g, can send nonce in layerzero.
|
||
|
/// @return the status of message processing/storage.
|
||
|
/// Note: sender validation (or) message validation should happen before processing the message.
|
||
|
function receiveMessage(
|
||
|
bytes memory chainId_,
|
||
|
bytes memory sender_,
|
||
|
bytes memory message_
|
||
|
bytes memory data_
|
||
|
) external payable returns (bool);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Rationale
|
||
|
|
||
|
The cross-chain arbitrary messaging interface will optimize the interoperability layer between blockchains with a feature-complete yet minimal interface. The light-weighted approach also provides arbitrary message bridges, and the freedom of innovating at the relayer level, to show their technical might.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The EIP will make blockchains more usable and scalable. It opens up the possibilities for building cross-chain applications by leveraging any two blockchains, not just those limited to Ethereum and compatible L2s. To put this into perspective, an easy-to-communicate mechanism will allow developers to build cross-chain applications across Ethereum and Solana, leveraging their unique advantages.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The interface also aims to reduce the risks of a single point of failure (SPOF) for applications/protocols, as they can continue operating by updating their AMB address.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Security Considerations
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fully permissionless messaging could be a security threat to the protocol. It is recommended that all the integrators review the implementation of messaging tunnels before integrating.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Without sender authentication, anyone could write arbitrary messages into the receiving smart contract.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This EIP focuses only on how the messages should be sent and received with a specific standard. But integrators can implement any authentication (or) message tunnel-specific operations inside the receive function leveraging `data_` parameter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Copyright
|
||
|
|
||
|
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md)
|