317 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
317 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
eip: 2390
|
||
|
title: Geo-ENS
|
||
|
author: James Choncholas (@james-choncholas)
|
||
|
discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/2959
|
||
|
status: Stagnant
|
||
|
type: Standards Track
|
||
|
category: ERC
|
||
|
created: 2019-11-15
|
||
|
requires: 137, 165, 1062, 1185
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Simple Summary
|
||
|
GeoENS brings geographic split horizon capabilities to ENS. It's GeoDNS for ENS!
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Abstract
|
||
|
This EIP specifies an ENS resolver interface for geographically split horizon DNS.
|
||
|
Geographic split horizon DNS returns resource records that are specific to an end
|
||
|
user's location.
|
||
|
This technique is commonly used by CDNs to direct traffic to content caches nearest users.
|
||
|
Geographic split horizon resolution is primarily geared towards ENS
|
||
|
resolvers storing DNS resource records [EIP-1185](./eip-1185.md), although the technique could be
|
||
|
used on other interfaces like IPFS content hash storage [EIP-1062](./eip-1062.md).
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Motivation
|
||
|
There are many use cases for traditional GeoDNS systems, like Amazon's Route53,
|
||
|
in the centralized web.
|
||
|
These use cases include proximity-based load balancing and serving content
|
||
|
specific to the geographic location of the query.
|
||
|
Unfortunately the ENS specification does not provide a mechanism for
|
||
|
geo-specific resolution.
|
||
|
ENS can respond to queries with IP addresses (as described in [EIP-1185](./eip-1185.md))
|
||
|
however there is no way to respond to geo-specific queries.
|
||
|
This EIP proposes a standard to give the ENS system geo-proximal awareness
|
||
|
to serve a similar purpose as GeoDNS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
GeoENS can do more than DNS-based solutions.
|
||
|
In addition to geographic split horizon DNS, GeoENS can be used for the following:
|
||
|
- Locating digital resources (like smart contracts) that represent physical objects in the real world.
|
||
|
- Smart contract managing access to a physical object associated with a specific location.
|
||
|
- ENS + IPFS web hosting (as described in [EIP-1062](./eip-1062.md)) with content translated to the native language of the query source.
|
||
|
- Tokenizing objects with a physical location.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Because of the decentralized nature of ENS, geo-specific resolution is different than traditional GeoDNS.
|
||
|
GeoDNS works as follows. DNS queries are identified by their source IP address.
|
||
|
This IP is looked up in a database like [GeoIP2](https://www.maxmind.com/en/geoip2-services-and-databases)
|
||
|
from MaxMind which maps the IP address to a location.
|
||
|
This method of locating the source of a query is error prone and unreliable.
|
||
|
If the GeoIP database is out of date, queried locations can be vastly different than their true location.
|
||
|
GeoENS does not rely on a database because the user includes a location in their query.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It follows that queries can be made by users for any location, not just their location.
|
||
|
Traditional DNS will only return the resource assigned to a query's provenance.
|
||
|
GeoENS does not correlate a query's provinance with a location, allowing the
|
||
|
entire globe to be queried from a single location.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An additional shortcoming of traditional DNS is the fact that there is no way to return a list of servers in a certain proximity.
|
||
|
This is paramount for uses cases that require discovering the resource with the lowest latency.
|
||
|
GeoENS allows a list of resources, like IP addresses, to be gathered within a specific location.
|
||
|
Then a client to determine themselves which resource has the lowest latency.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Lastly, publicly facing GeoDNS services do not give fine granularity control
|
||
|
over geographic regions for GeoDNS queries.
|
||
|
Cloud based DNS services like [Amazon's Route 53](https://aws.amazon.com/route53/)
|
||
|
only allow specifying geographic regions at the granularity of a State in
|
||
|
the United States.
|
||
|
GeoENS on the other hand gives 8 characters of geohash resolution which
|
||
|
corresponds to +-20 meter accuracy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Specification
|
||
|
This EIP proposes a new interface to ENS resolvers such that geo-spacial information
|
||
|
can be recorded and retrieved from the blockchain.
|
||
|
The interface changes are described below for "address resolvers" described in EIP137
|
||
|
however the idea applies to any record described in EIP1185 and EIP1062, namely DNS
|
||
|
Resolvers, Text Resolvers, ABI Resolvers, etc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### What is a geohash?
|
||
|
A [Geohash](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash#Algorithm_and_example)
|
||
|
is an interleaving of latitude and longitude bits, whose
|
||
|
length determines it's precision.
|
||
|
Geohashes are typically encoded in base 32 characters.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### function setGeoAddr(bytes32 node, string calldata geohash, address addr) external authorised(node)
|
||
|
Sets a resource (contract address, IP, ABI, TEXT, etc.) by node and geohash.
|
||
|
Geohashes must be unique per address and are exactly 8 characters long.
|
||
|
This leads to an accuracy of +-20 meters.
|
||
|
Write default initialized resource value, `address(0)`, to remove a resource from the resolver.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### function geoAddr(bytes32 node, string calldata geohash) external view returns (address[] memory ret)
|
||
|
Query the resolver contract for a specific node and location.
|
||
|
All resources (contract addresses, IP addresses, ABIs, TEXT records, etc.) matching
|
||
|
the node and prefix geohash provided are returned.
|
||
|
This permits querying by exact geohash of 8 characters to return the content at that location,
|
||
|
or querying by geographic bounding box described by a geohash of less than 8 character precision.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Any type of geohash can be used including [Z-order](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-order_curve)
|
||
|
[Hilbert](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_curve) or the more accurate
|
||
|
[S2 Geometry](https://s2geometry.io/devguide/s2cell_hierarchy.html) library
|
||
|
from Google.
|
||
|
There are also ways to search the geographic data using geohashes without
|
||
|
always ending up with a rectangular query region.
|
||
|
[Searching circular shaped regions](https://github.com/ashwin711/proximityhash) is
|
||
|
slightly more complex as it requires multiple queries.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Rationale
|
||
|
The proposed implementation uses a sparse [Quadtree](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/BF00288933) trie as an index for
|
||
|
resource records as it has low storage overhead and good search performance.
|
||
|
The leaf nodes of the tree store resource records while non-leaves represent one geohash character.
|
||
|
Each node in the tree at depth d corresponds to a geohash of precision d.
|
||
|
The tree has depth 8 because the maximum precision of a geohash is 8 characters.
|
||
|
The tree has fanout 32 because the radix of a geohash character is 32.
|
||
|
The path to get to a leaf node always has depth 8 and the leaf contains the content (like IP address)
|
||
|
of the geohash represented by the path to the leaf.
|
||
|
The tree is sparse as 71% of the Earth's surface is covered by water.
|
||
|
The tree facilitates common traversal algorithms (DFS, BFS) to return
|
||
|
lists of resource records within a geographic bounding box.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Backwards Compatibility
|
||
|
This EIP does not introduce issues with backwards compatibility.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Test Cases
|
||
|
See https://github.com/james-choncholas/resolvers/blob/master/test/TestPublicResolver.js
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Implementation
|
||
|
This address resolver, written in Solidity, implements the specifications outlined above.
|
||
|
The same idea presented here can be applied to other resolver interfaces as specified in EIP137.
|
||
|
Note that geohashes are passed and stored using 64 bit unsigned integers.
|
||
|
Using integers instead of strings for geohashes is more performant, especially in the `geomap` mapping.
|
||
|
For comparison purposes, see https://github.com/james-choncholas/geoens/tree/master/contracts/StringOwnedGeoENSResolver.sol for the inefficient string implementation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
```solidity
|
||
|
pragma solidity ^0.5.0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
import "../ResolverBase.sol";
|
||
|
|
||
|
contract GeoENSResolver is ResolverBase {
|
||
|
bytes4 constant ERC2390 = 0x8fbcc5ce;
|
||
|
uint constant MAX_ADDR_RETURNS = 64;
|
||
|
uint constant TREE_VISITATION_QUEUESZ = 64;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_0 = 48;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_9 = 57;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_a = 97;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_b = 98;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_i = 105;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_l = 108;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_o = 111;
|
||
|
uint8 constant ASCII_z = 122;
|
||
|
|
||
|
struct Node {
|
||
|
address data; // 0 if not leaf
|
||
|
uint256 parent;
|
||
|
uint256[] children; // always length 32
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// A geohash is 8, base-32 characters.
|
||
|
// A geomap is stored as tree of fan-out 32 (because
|
||
|
// geohash is base 32) and height 8 (because geohash
|
||
|
// length is 8 characters)
|
||
|
mapping(bytes32=>Node[]) private geomap;
|
||
|
|
||
|
event GeoENSRecordChanged(bytes32 indexed node, bytes8 geohash, address addr);
|
||
|
|
||
|
// only 5 bits of ret value are used
|
||
|
function chartobase32(byte c) pure internal returns (uint8 b) {
|
||
|
uint8 ascii = uint8(c);
|
||
|
require( (ascii >= ASCII_0 && ascii <= ASCII_9) ||
|
||
|
(ascii > ASCII_a && ascii <= ASCII_z));
|
||
|
require(ascii != ASCII_a);
|
||
|
require(ascii != ASCII_i);
|
||
|
require(ascii != ASCII_l);
|
||
|
require(ascii != ASCII_o);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (ascii <= (ASCII_0 + 9)) {
|
||
|
b = ascii - ASCII_0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
// base32 b = 10
|
||
|
// ascii 'b' = 0x60
|
||
|
// note base32 skips the letter 'a'
|
||
|
b = ascii - ASCII_b + 10;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// base32 also skips the following letters
|
||
|
if (ascii > ASCII_i)
|
||
|
b --;
|
||
|
if (ascii > ASCII_l)
|
||
|
b --;
|
||
|
if (ascii > ASCII_o)
|
||
|
b --;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
require(b < 32); // base 32 can't be larger than 32
|
||
|
return b;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
function geoAddr(bytes32 node, bytes8 geohash, uint8 precision) external view returns (address[] memory ret) {
|
||
|
bytes32(node); // single node georesolver ignores node
|
||
|
assert(precision <= geohash.length);
|
||
|
|
||
|
ret = new address[](MAX_ADDR_RETURNS);
|
||
|
if (geomap[node].length == 0) { return ret; }
|
||
|
uint ret_i = 0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// walk into the geomap data structure
|
||
|
uint pointer = 0; // not actual pointer but index into geomap
|
||
|
for(uint8 i=0; i < precision; i++) {
|
||
|
|
||
|
uint8 c = chartobase32(geohash[i]);
|
||
|
uint next = geomap[node][pointer].children[c];
|
||
|
if (next == 0) {
|
||
|
// nothing found for this geohash.
|
||
|
// return early.
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
pointer = next;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// pointer is now node representing the resolution of the query geohash.
|
||
|
// DFS until all addresses found or ret[] is full.
|
||
|
// Do not use recursion because blockchain...
|
||
|
uint[] memory indexes_to_visit = new uint[](TREE_VISITATION_QUEUESZ);
|
||
|
indexes_to_visit[0] = pointer;
|
||
|
uint front_i = 0;
|
||
|
uint back_i = 1;
|
||
|
|
||
|
while(front_i != back_i) {
|
||
|
Node memory cur_node = geomap[node][indexes_to_visit[front_i]];
|
||
|
front_i ++;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// if not a leaf node...
|
||
|
if (cur_node.data == address(0)) {
|
||
|
// visit all the chilins
|
||
|
for(uint i=0; i<cur_node.children.length; i++) {
|
||
|
// only visit valid children
|
||
|
if (cur_node.children[i] != 0) {
|
||
|
assert(back_i < TREE_VISITATION_QUEUESZ);
|
||
|
indexes_to_visit[back_i] = cur_node.children[i];
|
||
|
back_i ++;
|
||
|
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
ret[ret_i] = cur_node.data;
|
||
|
ret_i ++;
|
||
|
if (ret_i > MAX_ADDR_RETURNS) break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// when setting, geohash must be precise to 8 digits.
|
||
|
function setGeoAddr(bytes32 node, bytes8 geohash, address addr) external authorised(node) {
|
||
|
bytes32(node); // single node georesolver ignores node
|
||
|
|
||
|
// create root node if not yet created
|
||
|
if (geomap[node].length == 0) {
|
||
|
geomap[node].push( Node({
|
||
|
data: address(0),
|
||
|
parent: 0,
|
||
|
children: new uint256[](32)
|
||
|
}));
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// walk into the geomap data structure
|
||
|
uint pointer = 0; // not actual pointer but index into geomap
|
||
|
for(uint i=0; i < geohash.length; i++) {
|
||
|
|
||
|
uint8 c = chartobase32(geohash[i]);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (geomap[node][pointer].children[c] == 0) {
|
||
|
// nothing found for this geohash.
|
||
|
// we need to create a path to the leaf
|
||
|
geomap[node].push( Node({
|
||
|
data: address(0),
|
||
|
parent: pointer,
|
||
|
children: new uint256[](32)
|
||
|
}));
|
||
|
geomap[node][pointer].children[c] = geomap[node].length - 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
pointer = geomap[node][pointer].children[c];
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Node storage cur_node = geomap[node][pointer]; // storage = get reference
|
||
|
cur_node.data = addr;
|
||
|
|
||
|
emit GeoENSRecordChanged(node, geohash, addr);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceID) public pure returns (bool) {
|
||
|
return interfaceID == ERC2390 || super.supportsInterface(interfaceID);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Security Considerations
|
||
|
This contract has similar functionality to ENS Resolvers - refer there for security considerations.
|
||
|
Additionally, this contract has a dimension of data privacy.
|
||
|
Users query via the geoAddr function specifying a geohash of less than 8 characters
|
||
|
which defines the query region.
|
||
|
Users who run light clients leak the query region to their connected full-nodes.
|
||
|
Users who rely on nodes run by third parties (like Infura) will also leak
|
||
|
the query region.
|
||
|
Users who run their own full node or have access to a trusted full node do
|
||
|
not leak any location data.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Given the way most location services work, the query region is likely to contain
|
||
|
the user's actual location.
|
||
|
The difference between API access, light, and full nodes has always had
|
||
|
an impact on privacy but now the impact is underscored by the involvement
|
||
|
of coarse granularity user location.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Copyright
|
||
|
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).
|